The Ministry of Power is initiating consultations to implement Market Coupling across India's power exchanges — a move that could significantly alter the market dynamics. Currently, the Indian Energy Exchange (IEX) dominates the electricity trading landscape with over 90% market share, while Power Exchange India Limited (PXIL) and newer players account for the remaining share.
The proposed market coupling mechanism could dismantle the pricing advantage enjoyed by IEX and offer a level playing field to smaller exchanges like PXIL. In this article, we explore what market coupling means, how it works, and why it could disrupt the status quo in India’s power trading ecosystem.
Market Coupling refers to a centralised mechanism where a single agency or market coupling operator (MCO) collects bids from all participating power exchanges and then determines a uniform market clearing price based on aggregated demand and supply.
Under the current model, each exchange — IEX, PXIL, and others — conducts independent price discovery through its own auction system. This leads to slight variations in prices and liquidity across platforms. With market coupling, however, all orders flow into a central pool, and the same price and volume are allocated across all exchanges.
The concept is borrowed from European power markets, where market coupling ensures better efficiency, optimal resource allocation, and transparent pricing.
IEX has built its leadership on deep liquidity, superior price discovery, and trader confidence. With the introduction of market coupling:
IEX will no longer control price discovery, as a central agency will handle it.
Its dominance in volumes may face dilution, as other exchanges get equal access to trades.
The platform becomes a pass-through system rather than a price-setter, reducing its strategic edge.
In essence, IEX’s role shifts from being the market’s “brain” to just another “interface,” which may impact its margins, brand power, and growth narrative.
For PXIL, which has struggled to gain significant market share due to IEX’s dominance, market coupling presents a strategic opportunity:
Price parity with IEX eliminates one of PXIL’s biggest disadvantages.
Participants may prefer PXIL for reasons like lower transaction fees, better user interface, or integration with their systems.
As long as the final clearing price is same across platforms, smaller players can now compete more aggressively.
This could lead to volume growth, improved visibility, and potentially better financial performance for PXIL over the long term.
Initial industry reactions have been mixed. While smaller exchanges and independent power producers welcome the move, IEX’s investors and market participants are closely watching how the consultation process unfolds. The drop in IEX’s share price following the announcement is a reflection of the uncertainty and perceived negative impact.
If implemented well, market coupling could lead to:
More competitive and transparent electricity markets
Higher participation from industrial buyers
Reduced monopolistic tendencies in price discovery
However, the success of market coupling will depend on the design of the central system, governance rules, and how existing exchanges adapt.
The government’s plan to introduce market coupling could become a defining moment in India’s power trading history. While it poses a challenge to IEX’s long-standing dominance, it opens the door for smaller exchanges like PXIL to scale up and compete more effectively.
Investors in both listed and unlisted power sector plays must watch this space closely. As regulatory frameworks evolve, market positioning may shift faster than expected.